2014 Ratings as of December 6, 3:02 pm
by Average Computer Rating (ACR)

Division 2

North  South    All

1West Chester18-2 100.00.6470.581
2Millersville20-3 99.80.6670.640
3LIU Post18-4 98.90.6100.555
4Shippensburg15-5 98.80.6050.572
5Stonehill17-4 98.30.6050.555
6Limestone16-3 98.10.5690.468
7Adelphi14-7 97.60.5600.537
8East Stroudsburg11-9 97.60.5220.508
9Assumption12-7 97.10.5150.469
10Mercyhurst9-10 96.90.5080.521
11Merrimack9-8 96.90.5010.488
12Bloomsburg7-10 96.90.4990.533
13Slippery Rock9-10 96.80.4990.506
14American International12-8 96.60.5170.486
15Kutztown9-9 96.50.4730.436
16Bentley10-9 96.50.5140.515
17Saint Michael's9-9 96.40.4850.469
18Saint Anselm8-9 96.40.4930.503
19Bellarmine9-9 96.30.4860.483
20Lindenwood9-7 96.20.4670.406
21IUP6-11 95.90.4590.486
22Franklin Pierce8-10 95.20.4560.442
23Mansfield3-15 94.40.4070.478
24Southern Connecticut3-15 94.00.4040.479
25Dowling3-14 93.80.3950.459
26Seton Hill0-16 93.80.3590.466
27Newberry2-12 93.70.4070.507
28Mercy1-15 93.00.3440.422
29Southern New Hampshire0-17 92.60.3720.495

1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25*W/L pct. + 0.50*SOS + 0.25*opponents' SOS

4Strength of Schedule = Avg. of opponents' W/L pct. when not playing that team

  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).

  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.

  • Calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The ACR has no bearing on tournament selection, while the NCAA's official SOS and RPI are produced and published in October and November.

  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.