2016 Ratings as of November 20, 3:28 pm
by Average Computer Rating (ACR)

Division 2

East  North  South    All

1Shippensburg19-3 100.00.6290.560
2East Stroudsburg15-5 99.70.6050.568
3LIU Post16-4 99.60.6340.607
4Millersville17-5 99.40.6050.562
5West Chester12-7 99.00.5800.577
6Saint Anselm17-5 99.00.5880.529
7Stonehill14-6 99.00.5970.582
8Bloomsburg12-7 98.80.5490.527
9Adelphi13-6 98.30.5500.510
10Kutztown10-8 98.20.5240.507
11Merrimack9-8 98.10.5470.570
12Lindenwood15-3 98.00.5310.410
13Assumption10-8 98.00.5280.523
14IUP10-8 97.90.5220.504
15Limestone11-9 97.40.5430.579
16Pace9-9 97.30.4950.484
17Bellarmine13-7 97.20.4870.411
18American International10-8 97.20.5010.470
19Bentley7-11 96.90.4800.503
20Southern New Hampshire9-9 96.90.4840.468
21Slippery Rock6-12 96.80.4570.492
22Saint Michael's6-12 96.10.4500.485
23Queens (NC)9-7 96.10.4500.377
24Franklin Pierce3-14 95.60.4030.468
25Mercyhurst2-15 95.50.4200.527
26Seton Hill3-15 95.30.4100.485
27Mansfield2-16 95.10.3990.484
28Southern Connecticut4-14 95.00.4180.473
29Mercy7-13 94.90.4250.447
30Newberry5-10 94.50.4390.486
31St. Thomas Aquinas2-13 94.40.3750.458
32Belmont Abbey2-11 93.60.3690.456
33Molloy2-12 93.60.3310.360
34Lindenwood-Belleville (NAIA)0-1 88.90.1560.083

1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25*W/L pct. + 0.50*SOS + 0.25*opponents' SOS

4Strength of Schedule = Avg. of opponents' W/L pct. when not playing that team

  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).

  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.

  • Calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The ACR has no bearing on tournament selection, while the NCAA's official SOS and RPI are produced and published in October and November.

  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.