2017 Ratings as of November 19, 6:35 pm
by Strength of Schedule (SOS)

Division 2

North  South    All

1East Stroudsburg17-5 99.60.6340.610
2Millersville15-6 98.90.6140.606
3West Chester14-6 99.50.6090.598
4Shippensburg17-3 100.00.6490.597
5New Haven0-13 92.20.4040.566
6Bloomsburg10-9 97.90.5420.554
7IUP5-12 96.30.4780.546
8LIU Post19-4 99.00.6090.544
9Kutztown11-7 98.20.5530.534
10Assumption12-9 97.10.5310.531
11Merrimack11-7 97.30.5430.530
12Stonehill13-7 97.90.5570.529
13Southern Connecticut2-16 93.60.4110.522
14Adelphi7-11 96.20.4840.516
15Slippery Rock9-9 97.20.5170.515
16Saint Michael's7-11 95.90.4760.513
17Saint Anselm17-3 98.60.5890.505
18Seton Hill4-14 94.90.4350.503
19Limestone15-4 97.40.5620.497
20Queens (NC)6-11 94.60.4540.496
21Bellarmine8-11 95.20.4710.493
22Mansfield8-10 96.90.4890.487
23American International2-16 93.80.3930.480
24Bentley6-11 95.50.4530.479
25Belmont Abbey6-10 94.00.4420.469
26Lindenwood17-2 97.60.5810.468
27Newberry6-14 94.10.4210.463
28Southern New Hampshire8-9 96.20.4650.449
29Franklin Pierce10-7 96.50.4950.445
30Mercyhurst7-11 95.90.4450.436
31Pace15-4 97.60.5360.430
32Mercy7-11 94.20.4220.417
33Molloy0-18 91.60.3130.402
34St. Thomas Aquinas4-10 93.00.3750.381
35Converse5-9 93.30.3560.302

1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25*W/L pct. + 0.50*SOS + 0.25*opponents' SOS

4Strength of Schedule = Avg. of opponents' W/L pct. when not playing that team

  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).

  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.

  • Calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The ACR has no bearing on tournament selection, while the NCAA's official SOS and RPI are produced and published in October and November.

  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.