FieldHockeyCorner.com

2006 Ratings as of November 19, 1:45 pm
by Strength of Schedule (SOS)

Division 3

South

Great Lakes  NE East  NE West  North Atlantic South South Atlantic    All

RankTeamRecord1ACR2RPI3SOS4
1Ursinus20-3 99.70.6870.627
2Christopher Newport14-3 98.80.6690.618
3Catholic13-8 97.30.6040.599
4Johns Hopkins15-8 98.00.6030.586
5Franklin & Marshall5-12 95.60.5070.578
6Salisbury17-4 99.20.6340.575
7Frostburg State6-13 94.80.5090.574
8McDaniel10-9 96.70.5580.569
9Gettysburg10-8 97.10.5630.566
10Washington3-14 94.80.4670.564
11Dickinson7-10 95.60.5100.543
12Washington & Lee14-6 96.40.5750.534
13Swarthmore9-8 96.20.5290.529
14Saint Mary's12-5 97.20.5720.527
15Mary Washington12-7 96.50.5500.523
16Lynchburg17-3 97.50.6040.522
17Muhlenberg12-7 97.20.5450.517
18Eastern Mennonite12-7 96.50.5400.509
19Goucher1-14 92.40.3930.501
20Randolph-Macon7-10 94.80.4760.497
21Villa Julie5-15 93.20.4320.492
22Roanoke3-11 93.10.4200.489
23Virginia Wesleyan10-8 95.40.5030.486
24York11-9 95.60.5000.484
25Bridgewater6-11 93.80.4490.482
26Washington & Jefferson11-7 95.00.5100.477
27Haverford7-9 94.60.4640.473
28Bryn Mawr3-15 92.50.3870.461
29Shenandoah3-7 92.10.4110.447
30College of Notre Dame4-11 91.40.4010.445
31Sweet Briar2-13 91.20.3550.429
32Randolph-Macon Woman's2-11 90.80.3430.406
33Wilson9-8 92.50.3900.343
34Hood3-11 90.40.2960.324
35Mary Baldwin0-11 88.10.2300.307

1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25 * team's record + 0.50 * opponent's record + 0.25 * opponent's-opponent's record

4Strength of Schedule = (2/3) * opponent's record + (1/3) * opponent's-opponent's record

Notes
  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).


  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.


  • These calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The SOS and ACR have no bearing on selection to the NCAA, while the NCAA's official RPI will be produced and published in October and November.


  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.


Home