FieldHockeyCorner.com

2026 Ratings as of October 14, 11:05 pm
by Strength of Schedule (SOS)

Division 3

III

I  II III IV  V  VI    All

RankTeamRecord1ACR2RPI3SOS4
1New Paltz4-9 94.10.5350.656
2Vassar7-5 96.50.6110.644
3William Smith7-8 95.50.5700.637
4Rochester8-5 95.80.5930.617
5Ithaca10-3 96.60.6090.568
6Hartwick7-5 94.50.5440.558
7Union7-5 95.50.5700.556
8Cortland10-1 97.20.6490.555
9St. Lawrence4-7 93.50.4920.546
10RPI10-2 96.30.6160.539
11Oswego4-8 92.20.4590.510
12Geneseo9-3 96.10.5750.509
13Skidmore6-7 95.00.5040.499
14St. John Fisher6-7 93.20.4770.491
15Penn State Harrisburg8-5 93.40.5090.485
16Oneonta5-6 93.10.4580.456
17Russell Sage5-8 91.40.4320.454
18Keuka0-10 88.50.3250.438
19Nazareth1-9 89.90.3600.429
20Houghton8-3 93.90.5150.422
21Utica3-9 91.20.3840.417
22Hartford3-10 89.80.3720.405
23Brockport10-2 93.70.5180.388
24Washington & Jefferson1-8 87.70.3260.381
25Morrisville4-5 91.60.4150.380
26Elmira3-8 89.20.3460.339
27Alfred0-1 86.70.2800.333

1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25*W/L pct. + 0.50*SOS + 0.25*opponents' SOS

4Strength of Schedule = Avg. of opponents' W/L pct. when not playing that team

Notes
  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).


  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.


  • Calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The ACR has no bearing on tournament selection, while the NCAA's official SOS and RPI are produced and published in October and November.


  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.


Home